Independent, data-driven ratings for professional grappling & jiu jitsu

Methodology

The Grappling Index rates every professional grappler from verified match results — no panels, no politics, no favors. The exact coefficients are proprietary; the principles are not:

  • Opponent strength drives everything. Beating a top-rated athlete moves your rating far more than beating an unrated one. Padding a record does nothing here.
  • How you win matters. A submission moves the needle more than a points win; a points win more than a referee decision.
  • Ratings admit what they don't know. Every rating carries an uncertainty band (±). Few matches or a long layoff widen it; the band tightens as evidence accumulates.
  • Inactivity doesn't erase greatness — it raises doubt. Athletes keep their rating while inactive, but leave the active ladder after 18 months without a match. Peak ratings are preserved on the all-time list.
  • Gi and no-gi are separate sports here. Each has its own ladder; nothing is averaged. The Overall rating is a third, independent rating computed across every professional match in both rulesets — the answer to "best grappler, period."
  • Format context matters. Winner-stays-on team formats (e.g. Quintet-style) structurally pit tired athletes against fresh ones, so those results carry reduced weight in both directions — the ratings learn from them, cautiously.
  • Only professional adult matches score. ADCC and its trials, IBJJF adult black belt, WNO, PGF, Polaris, UFC BJJ, EBI and peers. No youth, masters, amateur or exhibition results — and no Combat Jiu Jitsu, which the Index treats as a different sport.
  • Unverified rulesets don't score. Promotions that run both gi and no-gi under one banner (e.g. Fight to Win) only count toward a ladder when the specific match's ruleset is verified.
  • Corrections: every match in the database carries its source. If a result is wrong, it gets fixed and every affected rating recomputes.